A Terra Chartarum programme
Corpus Chartarum Daciae
Seven trenches cut into the same ground from different directions: what a place was called, what the record declines to say, where a frontier was moved, what a map was made to prove. They share one corpus and one Atlas, and none of them owns either.
- Trenches
- 7
- Published
- 2
- Open verification debts
- 14
The trenches
Each trench is an argument with its own evidence and its own six gates. A gate that has not passed is stated rather than hidden, because a programme that reports only its finished work is not reporting.
-
published before the programme; joins the corpus by migration
- Status
- Published
- Gates passed
- 2 of 6
- Shared records
- 21
- Open debts
- 4
-
Hiatvs · Argumentum ex Silentio
The Archiveabsence taxonomy trench
- Status
- Research open
- Gates passed
- 0 of 6
- Shared records
- none yet
- Open debts
- 1
-
published proving trench consuming the shared CND release
- Status
- Published
- Gates passed
- 6 of 6
- Shared records
- 13
- Open debts
- none
-
Carta Rvbra · The Ethnographic Weapon
The Borderconsumes the treaty-frontier system
- Status
- Research open
- Gates passed
- 0 of 6
- Shared records
- none yet
- Open debts
- 1
-
Borroczyn · The Parcel and the Bulldozer
The Citybounded Bucharest cadastral seam
- Status
- Research open
- Gates passed
- 0 of 6
- Shared records
- none yet
- Open debts
- 1
-
Dacia Rediviva · Ancestry as Cartography
The Theatreclosing reception-history trench
- Status
- Not begun
- Gates passed
- 0 of 6
- Shared records
- none yet
- Open debts
- none
-
In Manibvs · Dacia in the Cabinet
The Archivephysically inspected sheets only
- Status
- Research open
- Gates passed
- 0 of 6
- Shared records
- none yet
- Open debts
- 3
How the records connect
These paths are compiled from identifiers that already resolve across registries. They show the graph that exists now, not the links planned trenches are expected to acquire. The attestation tier remains research-only until a named reviewer clears its records.
-
Honterus to Apulum
raw- period 1532
- source Chorographia Transylvaniae
src-honterus-chorographia - attestation Weissenburg (alternative)
att-0016 - place Apulum
plc-apulum - map object Honterus' Transylvania
honterus - cartographer Johannes Honterus
honterus - atlas layer CND research attestations
dacia-attestations-research - corpus record att-0016
att-0016 - related trench Terra Sigillata · Lapidarivm Dacicvm
ccd-a - stratum Stratum Honterus
honterus
Shared infrastructure
The corpus and the Atlas layers belong to the programme. A trench reads them; it does not keep its own copy. The generated graph counts the shared records each compiler actually reads; a prose note cannot put a trench on this list. 2 trenches currently consume shared corpus records.
- Corpus Nominum Daciae Corpus
120 places, 30 sources, 130 attestations
- Attestation projection Atlas layer
Every compiled attestation, silences included, at its place's reference point
- Roman Dacia baseline Atlas layer
Sites joined to corpus places; roads and frontier corridors beside them
- Principality phases, 1526-1859 Atlas layer
Dated phases rather than one timeless outline
- Treaty frontiers, 1829-1947 Atlas layer
Phases attributed to their instruments, competing lines kept apart
- Josephinian sheet index Atlas layer
Survey footprints over the corpus, linking to the repository
Workstreams
Work that serves every trench rather than belonging to one.
- Dacia acquisition dossiers planned
plate/state verification ahead of purchase
- Dacia Atlas layers planned
shared GIS family and CND projection
- Programme index and cross-trench integration planned
programme landing page and cycle closeout
- Corpus Nominum Daciae live
canonical place/source/attestation authority
The cycle's index
Terra Sigillata is the programme's intellectual index. Its thirteen strata are the periods every other trench cuts through, and its four test pits are where the corpus began: the exhibition was the corpus before there was one, and its records migrated into the shared authorities rather than being copied beside them.
It is read here as an index and not extended as one. No stone was added to it, and none will be: a trench that needs a new period writes its own argument rather than enlarging the one that came first.